Settlement Agreement Tomlin Order
 It can only be challenged if it is found a posteriori that the comparison was obtained by fraud. If, initially, fraud was alleged in the proceedings, but a settlement was subsequently concluded and taken up in a decision, the case cannot be reopened later if “better evidence of the fraud has been revealed than during the implementation of the settlement contract”.  After Bolton filled in the first dismissal, Kras took his step. Kras sought a summary judgment on the ground that the referral in substance and indeed was equivalent to a judgment decision. That`s why, Kras says, because they were supposed to be common unauthorized with Bolton, Bolton erased the satisfaction of Vanden`s claim against them. The district judge agreed. First, the Court of Appeal ruled that the approval order could block Vanden`s claims against Kras. The approval settlement clearly required Bolton to pay an amount to satisfy Vanden`s claims and that it was therefore a “final injunction.” If the case had been taken to court, the final order would have been similar.. . . .